The Gulf of Mexico's 'Dead Zone' Could Balloon to Over 8,000 Square Miles This Summer

Illustration for article titled The Gulf of Mexico's 'Dead Zone' Could Balloon to Over 8,000 Square Miles This Summer
Photo: NASA Earth Observatory

The Midwest floods portended a bad year for the Gulf of Mexico’s dead zone way back in March—it was just a question of how bad things could get. Now with a few months more date, scientists have an answer.


On Monday, a number of research groups including the federal government released their forecasts for the dead zone, a vast region of oxygen-starved water that spreads across the Gulf of Mexico every summer. The forecast is an ugly one. According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) forecast, an area the size of Massachusetts could see an algae bloom that gobbles up oxygen and crowds out all aquatic life, creating an ecological and economic catastrophe. Other forecasts range even higher, but all peg this as one of the worst dead zones ever recorded in the Gulf of Mexico largely due to the Midwest floods.

NOAA’s forecast relies on a suite of models developed by its research partners. The amalgamation of those models shows the dead zone could reach 7,829 square miles later this summer. The team at Louisiana State University—which contributes a model to the NOAA suite—is forecasting a dead zone of 8,717 square miles, which would rival the largest dead zone ever recorded of 8,776 square miles set in 2017.

“When you get down it, [the forecasts] are not that much different,” Nancy Rabalais, a marine ecologist at the Louisiana Universities Marine Consortium who worked on the LSU forecast, told Earther. “It’s going to be large, and that means it’s going to be too large.”

A tropical storm spinning up could help break up the dead zone and prevailing winds could push it around. But the volume of the low-oxygen zone itself is unlikely to change.

The Gulf of Mexico dead zone has become an annual occurrence largely due to farming practices upstream. Farmers in the Midwest generally load their fields with nitrogen fertilizer to coax high yields of corn, wheat, soybeans, and other crops out of the ground. A good chunk of that fertilizer is scooped up by runoff when it rains, however, and steered down rivers and streams that flow into the Mississippi River that in turn dumps all that gunk in the Gulf of Mexico. Cities’ wastewater and other source of nitrogen also ends up in rivers, adding to the nitrogen load stream into the Gulf. Once there, it helps fuel algae blooms that suck up all the oxygen out of the bottom waters—a process known as hypoxia—forcing fish, shrimp, and other Gulf critters to move to more oxygen-rich waters or die off.


This year’s dead zone is will be influenced by the record-setting flooding in the Midwest. The U.S. Geological Survey does river monitoring that informed the dead zone forecast this year. According to the agency, the Mississippi and Atchafalaya rivers May discharge was 67 percent higher than the 1980-2018 average. The rushing waters dumped an estimated 156,000 metric tons of nitrate and 25,300 metric tons of phosphorus into the Gulf of Mexico last month, well above the long-term average.

“It’s not just the amount of water coming into the Gulf, it’s the nitrogen load which is high but still going up,” Rabalais said.


This year’s dire forecast points to the need to cut down on fertilizer in fields, which Rabalais said accounts for “way more than 50 percent” of the nitrogen that ends up in the Gulf of Mexico. To that end, there’s a federal Hypoxia Task Force that’s been tasked with the goal of reducing the dead zone to an average of 1,900 square miles, but it’s an uphill battle. Direct measurements of the dead zone have been ongoing since the 1980s and it’s been growing over that time. Rabalais said sediment cores from the Gulf show that the growth has been ongoing since decades before then as fertilizer applications have ramped up.

Climate change could make the task of reducing the dead zone even more challenging. Heavy precipitation events like the ones that drove this year’s Midwest floods have become common, and the trend is expected to continue into the future. That means more runoff could steer more fertilizer off fields and into waterways, making the problem worse. Large dead zones like the one predicted to occur this year could also strain the limits of our forecasting capabilities.


“This year’s historic and sustained river flows will test the accuracy of these models in extreme conditions, which are likely to occur more frequently in the future according to the latest National Climate Assessment,” Steve Thur, the director of NOAA’s National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science said in a press release.

Warm waters also hold less oxygen, adding another layer to the crisis in the Gulf even if we manage to choke off the flow of harmful pollution. Rabalais said that the Gulf has a “memory” of what happened in previous years and that it now takes less nitrogen input to create bigger algae blooms than it used to.


“The system has shifted,” she said.

Managing editor, Earther


Dense non aqueous phase liquid

Very excellent stuff.

Oh Christ. We’re coming up to 2020 elections. What does that have to do with the Mississippi river basin nutrient loading? Everything.

Pinpointing who, what, where, when, why and how nutrients load the Mississippi River and how that creates a Gulf of Mexico dead zone has been studied as long as I can remember. It’s pretty settled science. The lion’s share (like a big fat hungry lion) comes from runoff/groundwater and a small percentage comes from muni wastewater treatment discharge.

Nutrient Loading for the Mississippi River and Subbasins

This area of study has been done by USGS. Trump wants USGS to focus on oil and gas, btw.

However, settle science doesn’t mean shit as we know with climate change.

So, per usual, it will be all Chicago’s fault. Nothing gets Midwestern ag state voters more engaged to vote than the mere mention of Chicago. It goes back to the 19th century ag markets and thusly where prices are set being located in Chicago.

Trump will probably mention that it’s all coming from Chicago’s wastewater treatment system (that’s flowing to the Gulf instead of Lake Michigan due to reversing the Chicago river) - not America’s hard working farm families - which Obama tried to screw with his Waters of the United States legislation. That he is gutting to save America’s hard working farm families from Obama. Who’s from Chicago.