Pacific Crabbers Are the First Big Industry to Sue Big Oil

Illustration for article titled Pacific Crabbers Are the First Big Industry to Sue Big Oilem/em
Photo: AP

In 2015, the crab pots sat empty and boats sat idle in small towns up and down the California coast. A wave of warm water—dubbed the Blob—had washed over the West Coast, bringing with it a toxic algae bloom that infected Dungeness crabs with a potent neurotoxin.

Advertisement

The state closed the crab fishery, one of the most important economic engines along the coast, for five months. It delayed the crabbing season in 2016 because toxins were still at unsafe levels, causing an estimated $110 million in lost revenue across those two seasons. That’s a preview of what’s to come in a hotter future, which is why crabbers joined the ever-expanding list of people to sue Big Oil. The suit, filed last week in California, is the first of its kind to pit one industry against another and could offer a template to other industries ravaged by climate change.

“For us, this is the new reality,” Noah Oppenheim, the executive director of the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations (PCFFA), told Earther. “Our future is one that will be plagued by direct climate impacts. Our suit is an attempt to ameliorate that.”

Advertisement

The suit names 30 fossil fuel companies, including Chevron, BP, Exxon, and other multinationals. Together, the defendants are responsible for 15 percent of the world’s carbon emissions from burning oil and gas over the past 50 years. Moreover, many of these companies knew of the risks rising carbon pollution posed to the planet’s climate and instead buried their findings and sowed doubt (they’re also still doing that). Those factors have opened them up to lawsuits by cities, states, and now industries suffering the consequences.

The PCFFA suit points to the impacts carbon pollution has had on the world’s oceans. Namely, that it’s caused them to warm about a degree Celsius since record keeping began in the late 1800s. While the Blob was likely the confluence of natural factors like El Niño and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, scientists have also said climate change was “clearly a prime suspect.”

The extreme marine heat wave caused algae to bloom and produce copious amounts of domoic acid, a powerful neurotoxin that built up at the bottom of the food chain, including in the meat of Dungeness crabs. Any crabs or other fish where domoic acid is present at levels greater than 30 parts per million is deemed unsafe to eat and cause severe stomach problems or even death. It’s also highly toxic to marine mammals like sea lions.

In response to high levels in 2015, California shut down its crab fisheries. This year has seen a partial return of Blob-like conditions, delaying the opening of crab fisheries yet again. Oppenheim said that between now and Christmas is a crucial time for the fishermen and women, many of whom are small operators.

Advertisement

Delaying the opening of the season means “[w]e miss our high value sales opportunities,” he said. “We run the risk of losing public confidence.”

Based on those impacts as well as the fact that fossil fuel companies knew about the havoc they were wreaking, PCFFA is suing for damages during the Blob years. Oppenheim said the group is also seeking help implementing methods that can improve predictions of domoic acid outbreaks—which are almost entirely based on temperature—and in solutions like depuration tanks that crabs can be stored in until they get rid of the built up domoic acid. Those solutions can allow the fishery to exist and even thrive in a world where global warming is likely to make algae outbreaks like this ever more common.

Advertisement

“The resource isn’t threatened by this,” he said. “The crabs are doing OK, but we’re really worried about those nonlinear effects that can destroy communities, that erode at cohesion of port towns in coastal California and Oregon.”

Managing editor, Earther

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

warriorscot
warriorscot

So I’m a total pro sustainable environment advocate, to the point where I went out and did a Doctorate in Renewables. BUT:

Is nonsense, at the end of the day it’s the consumer that is the responsible party, we have a market based system and while oil companies in the US were pretty good at not publishing information the rest of the planet didn’t have that excuse and knew of the dangers of fossil fuels in the 70s.

But at the end of the day it was the least worst solution to our problems, and yes we probably could have done a lot more to move away from it. Much of the technology we later used for renewable energy actually started out in the 70s oil crisis backlash, and ironically the only people that kept funding that work(and publishing it) was the oil companies(BP in particular for many years kept Solar PV research afloat by paying for researchers to work out of its UK HQ near Weybridge). BP at least on the European side was actually a good 20 years ahead on environmental and renewable research for a long long time.

When push comes to shove blaming the supplier doesn’t really solve the problem, especially as those are now the companies that have the money to really change the game and are actually investing heavily in Renewables as at the end of the game they are ENERGY companies not OIL companies.

I do though love the irony of the Fishing industry talking crap about the Oil industry. I think if you tallied up the environmental impact of both Oil is probably still well ahead.