Embattled Telescope Delays Decision on Whether to Remain in Hawaii

Artist’s concept of the Thirty Meter Telescope on Mauna Kea
Artist’s concept of the Thirty Meter Telescope on Mauna Kea
Image: TMT International Observatory

The Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) is deferring a decision on whether to stay in Hawaii or move to a back-up location in the Canary Islands while it waits to secure permits in either, the telescope’s board announced Friday.


A year ago, Gizmodo reported that the board for the TMT—slated to become the world’s most powerful telescope—was hoping to break ground on its giant observatory by April 2018. That deadline is fast slipping away, but the decision to move to an alternate site is being kicked down the road. The board isn’t ready to give up on the nearly 14,000 foot behemoth of Mauna Kea, considered the best place for astronomy in the Northern Hemisphere.

But the telescope has faced fierce opposition from some Native Hawaiians, who view the mountaintop as sacred and say it should be left untouched. The untouched part is impossible, with 13 other observatories already peppering its snowy peaks, but opponents don’t want to see another. There are concerns over the environmental impacts, the degradation of culturally-significant viewsheds, and the the continued prioritization of western science despite Native dissent. 


The telescope has already conducted what its board describes as a “very extensive” environmental impact statement that includes leaving zero waste on the mountain and choosing a site that poses “no risk” to any endangered plants or animals. It has altered its design to minimize the observatory’s visual impact, and agreed to a $1 million yearly lease, a big chunk of which will go toward stewardship of Mauna Kea.

For some, these gestures haven’t been enough. In late 2015, the telescope’s construction permit was voided by the Hawaiian Supreme Court following legal action by a Native-led coalition of opponents, that argued due process had been violated when the permit was issued. The TMT’s future in Hawaii uncertain, its board secured an alternate construction site atop the island of La Palma in the Canary Islands (still an excellent place for astronomy, but one that’s more susceptible to weather and atmospheric interference).

Those in favor of the Hawaii site received some ostensibly good news back in September, when after a long-contested case hearing, the state Board of Land and Natural Resources decided to issue a new construction permit for the scope.

Opponents were quick to challenge that decision, though, appealing the matter to the Hawaiian Supreme Court. That appeal is ongoing, while arguments for another appeal over a consent to sublease were heard in March.


On Thursday, Hawaii’s state Senate voted in favor of a bill banning any new construction on Mauna Kea, but included a provision that the ban could be lifted following various audits. The Honolulu Star-Advertiser reports the bill is likely to go nowhere in the House.

The dragged-out process and delays may put the TMT’s competitiveness at risk, with next-generation observatories expected online in the southern hemisphere by the mid-2020s. But for now, the board will continue to wait.


“A decision will be made on the planned location of the Thirty Meter Telescope as further progress is made in the legal and regulatory processes at both proposed sites,” the board said in a statement, adding that the TMT is moving forward with an environmental and permitting process in the Canary Islands.

“Ultimately the decision will be made by the Supreme Court,” Ed Stone, Executive Director of the TMT International Observatory, told Earther.


Stone told Earther that Mauna Kea remains the TMT’s preferred site. But if it doesn’t pan out in “a timeline that’s workable,” he feels confident the permits will come through for the Canary Islands.

“We do feel that they are very welcoming to having a telescope,” he said.


Maddie Stone is a freelancer based in Philadelphia.

Share This Story

Get our newsletter


Dense non aqueous phase liquid

Man o’ man, let’s look at this cynically. Please note, I’m an old cynic and come to realize that big science builds aren’t too different than big industry builds.

The Billion-Dollar Telescope Race

“How three groups are competing to make the first extremely large telescope.”

The article is from 2014, but the competition seems to remain.

Three new observatories are on the drawing boards, all with diameters, or apertures,3 between 25 and 40 meters, and all with estimated first light being collected in 2022: the Giant Magellan Telescope (GMT, headquartered in Pasadena, Calif.), the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT, also in Pasadena) and the European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT, headquartered in Garching, Germany).

The competing telescopes are planned for Chile.

So with this as background, let’s play project planning all the way from concept through design. This also includes permitting.

If I was hired to push through a TMT competitor and knowing that my client doesn’t want to be a science also ran, then it would be incumbent on me to turtle the progress of TMT. Maybe I’m not a total sleaze bag - just good at knowing what the client wants.

Let’s assume the German project team went to Hawaii to figure out possible choke points along the progress track. Getting native folks involved with project development or non development is becoming a thing. Maybe go round up any and all natives to remind them that that big ass telescope is being built on their ancestral land and will fuck up their entire culture if it gets built. Maybe bring a big bag of cash.

End result, TMT gets stuck in legal and permitting quick sand. The German Extremely Large Telescope goes swimmingly through regulatory review and voila, gets built! Germans find a planet populated with lederhosen wearing beer swilling blonde haired “aliens” somewhere in a galaxy far far away.

But of course, that’s cynical. Cynicism is bad in Trump’s America. We need enthusiasm only for snake oil sales.