Civil Liberties Group Raises Concerns Over Potential Surveillance of Pipeline Protestors

Yeah, what the sign says.
Yeah, what the sign says.
Photo: AP

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) is suing the federal government over suspicions that it’ll be working closely with local police departments and private security agencies to keep protests to a minimum as the Keystone XL Pipeline inches closer to reality.

The group launched the lawsuit Tuesday in the U.S. District Court of Montana against the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Department of the Interior, and Department of Justice. The goal? To retrieve records and plans these federal agencies have to surveil and quash protests led by those hoping to stop the pipeline. The ACLU and ACLU of Montana have requested federal documents and believe there’s more the government is withholding. Records released to date indicate “substantial evidence” of preventative measures the feds are already taking in preparation for potential protests including counterterrorism training, according to a blog post.

The blog post on the issue reads:

From these [requested] records, we hope to determine what plans the government has for thwarting, surveilling, and otherwise engaging with indigenous and environmental activists who oppose the construction of another oil pipeline. We also hope to determine whether and how the federal government is targeting indigenous communities to preempt political protest.


There’s precedent for these concerns. Investigations eventually uncovered that people who participated in protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline at Standing Rock were being heavily surveilled by local police departments and private contractors. At least one undercover FBI informant even infiltrated the camps where opponents were staying. This suit also comes as various states around the country pass laws to restrict organizing aimed at stopping energy projects like Keystone XL.  

Construction on the Keystone XL Pipeline, which would run from Alberta to Nebraska, is set to begin next year, and developer TransCanada has already begun writing up road agreements with county officials in South Dakota. Resistance is expected, and this lawsuit could shed light on how the company and law enforcement seek to retaliate.

Yessenia Funes is climate editor at Atmos Magazine. She loves Earther forever.

Share This Story

Get our `newsletter`


Dense non aqueous phase liquid

Not to assume the role of news feeder, but here it is...

It looks like it ain’t going to get any easier for socio-enviro protestors and lawyers to stop a pipeline through an indian reservation, road, water project, airport, ICE concentration camp, US/Mexico border wall etc. Seemingly congress is ramrodding “The Permitting Litigation Efficiency Act” up all of our asses.

From Law360 today:

House Judiciary Panel Approves Expedited Permitting Bill

The details:

H.R. 5468: Permitting Litigation Efficiency Act of 2018

And now from an excited interest group - National Association of Manufacturers...

House Judiciary Committee to Vote on Legislation to Speed Permitting Process

that quotes a study from an environmental professionals group called NAEP (not NEPA) that seemingly appears to be one of those bullshit (“we do clients not science”) dark money funded enviro groups. Who knows, I see Diane Feinstein’s husband Richard Blum’s old companies advertising on NAEP website. Blum btw, helped merge pretty much the entire business of environmental consulting into one mega deathstar of a company. Know who butters your bread, kids.


The thing about the environmental business is that there is a lot of compulsory reading and writing (throw up emoji, ah, here it is🤮) necessary. The problem is that folks who like to read and write (chiefly arts and letters majors) become lawyers, journalists, publicists, lobbyists, dark money funded NGO flacks, and such. Nobody with reading and writing skills really wants to read and write without getting paid to do it.

Here’s the first law of environmental law, consulting and contracting from the perspective of performance bond holding contractor:

1) nobody actually reads laws and regulations (especially lawyers if they’re not on retainer) so it’s up to the contractor to read that shit.