Brett Kavanaugh Might Get to Decide if Historic Youth Climate Trial Goes Forward

Illustration for article titled Brett Kavanaugh Might Get to Decide if Historic Youth Climate Trial Goes Forward
Photo: AP

With under two weeks until the start of a historic youth climate trial, the Justice Department is still trying to wriggle out of defending the U.S. government’s inaction on climate change. For the second time in four months, it has petitioned the Supreme Court to stop the trial. This time, however, Brett Kavanaugh could have a say in the matter.

Advertisement

The last time the Justice Department put in a request for a stay, it was fielded by Justice Anthony Kennedy. Kennedy referred the request to the whole court and the decision to deny it came down a day before his retirement.

The new request for a stay will go to Chief Justice John Roberts, who is currently providing guidance for the Ninth Circuit where the trial is set to take place. Roberts can rule on his own or refer the request to the whole court where Kavanaugh, Kennedy’s replacement, would weigh in.

Advertisement

It would be one of the first high-profile environmental law decisions of Kavanaugh’s tenure on the court that has begun under, shall we say, auspicious circumstances. While Kennedy filled the “swing justice” role, Kavanaugh has been reliably conservative and made Earther’s list as one of the worst potential justices on environmental issues before he was nominated.

While the court said in its July ruling that the case should go on, it also noted the scope of the plaintiffs’ claims was “striking” and that there are “substantial grounds for difference of opinion” about whether they should be heard by federal justice system. The new request for a stay and make up of the court could change the outcome this time around.

That said, Meg Ward, the communications director for Our Children’s Trust, the group leading this and other state-level youth climate cases, told Earther that “counsel is not concerned and is fully prepared to begin trial on the 29th.”

There’s been a flurry of activity the past week to try and slow down or derail the trial. In addition to Thursday’s Supreme Court petition, the Justice Department asked for the president to be removed from the suit and narrow the scope and witnesses that the plaintiffs can call. While the agency succeeded on the president and scope fronts, judges with the Ninth Circuit are still weighing the witness question.

Advertisement

Regardless, Our Children’s Trust said the witnesses have booked their travel to Eugene, Oregon, the site of the case, and are ready for it to go to trial.

Update: John Roberts temporarily stayed the case late on Friday, asking for the plaintiffs to respond to issues the government raised. Julia Olson, the chief legal counsel for Our Children’s Trust said in a statement that “[w]e are confident once Chief Justice Roberts and the full Court receive the youth plaintiffs’ response to defendants’ mischaracterization of their case, the trial will proceed.”

Advertisement

Managing editor, Earther

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

dnapl
Dense non aqueous phase liquid

This is odd. Claim for relief number 1 on page 84:

Bolding is done by me.

279. Our nation’s climate system, including the atmosphere and oceans, is critical to Plaintiffs’ rights to life, liberty, and property. Our nation’s climate system has been, and continues to be, harmed by Defendants. Defendants harmed our nation’s climate system with full appreciation of the results of their acts. Plaintiffs’ substantive Fifth Amendment rights have been infringed because Defendants directly caused atmospheric CO2 to rise to levels that dangerously interfere with a stable climate system required alike by our nation and Plaintiffs. The present CO2 concentration and continuing CO2 emissions – a function, in substantial part, of Defendants’ historic and continuing permitting, authorizing, and subsidizing of fossil fuel extraction, production, transportation, and utilization – endangers Plaintiffs’ lives, liberties, and property.

I realize there’s the global climate system as well as microclimates - but there is not really a national climate system. Our National Weather Service only talks about the weather. Maybe the CIA actual does have a weather machine to counteract the Soviet’s weather machine.

I say have the kids enlist in the armed forces and lead America into a fight against China and the rest of world (RoW).

Latest from EU Emissions Database for Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) - a pretty good source for global emissions tallying:

JRC SCIENCE FOR POLICY REPORT: Fossil CO2 & GHG emissions of all world countries

and all Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Please note: if it’s not obvious from this comment and previous ones I made, I think this kind of lawsuit is total bullshit. I truly believe it was filed to fight a proposed natural gas (LNG) export terminal in Portland, OR and got out of hand.

Green groups generally only sue the US government because they don’t have the balls to sue wealthy individuals, corporations and foundations. That would be biting the hands that feed them. Fuckers.

Trump/republicans are gutting the administrative state (i.e. most of the defendendents listed in the complaint). This lawsuits actually helps the republicans in their 40 year march to destroy the administrative state.