Trump Denies California Vital Aid for Wildfire Damage (Updated: He Flipped)

Charred Joshua Trees along Pallet Creek Rd. during the Bobcat Fire in Valyermo, California.
Charred Joshua Trees along Pallet Creek Rd. during the Bobcat Fire in Valyermo, California.
Photo: Kyle Grillot (Getty Images)

You know those wildfires California has been seeing this year, the record-breaking ones that have killed at least 31 people? Well, the Trump administration is rejecting the state’s request for disaster relief.

Advertisement

Last month, California officials asked the federal government for an emergency declaration of aid to help with their recovery process from six of its largest fires this year, including the Creek Fire in Fresno and Madera counties, which is the biggest solo blaze in the state’s history. The fire season has also seen a number of fires merge into even larger complexes that have wrought massive damage. In a Sept. 28 letter, California Gov. Gavin Newsom said he expects the infrastructure damage from the fires in question—the Valley Fire in San Diego, the El Dorado Fire in San Bernardino County, the Slater Fire in Siskiyou County, the Oak Fire in Mendocino County, the Bobcat Fire in Los Angeles, and the Creek Fire—will surpass $229 million.

“The longer it takes for California and its communities to recover, the more severe, devastating, and irreversible the economic impacts will be,” Newsom wrote.

Advertisement

The governor also said that the covid-19 pandemic has posed additional challenges to normal evacuation procedures due to the need for social distancing, making this fire season particularly costly. Rather than offering congregate shelters for evacuees, for instance, the state offered hotel rooms.

In August, the Trump administration did approve another major disaster declaration for California. But Trump has threatened to deny fire aid before. Last year, he tweeted that he’d halt all funds to the state “unless they get their act together, which is unlikely.” Federal officials have not clarified why they denied Newsom’s request this time around (not that I can really imagine a worthy excuse).

It’s no secret that Trump and Newsom have feuded over environmental issues in the past. But it’s worth noting that the Constitution’s tenth amendment prohibits the federal government from conditioning aid to states on their agreement with the administration’s politics.

When it comes to aid packages like the one California requested, “it’s not that unusual for there to be a denial for ‘smaller’ disasters” Samantha Montano, an assistant professor of emergency management and disaster science at University of Nebraska Omaha, said in a Twitter direct message. But for a disaster of this size—the six fires in question killed at least three people, scorched 1.8 million acres, and destroyed homes and livelihoods—the move seems unconscionable.

Advertisement

The president has repeatedly blamed bad forest management for the state’s unprecedented 2020 wildfires, and though it’s true that managed burns can help mitigate fire disasters, he has made it clear that he doesn’t really know what he’s talking about. When it comes to the impact of the climate crisis on the blazes, last month, Trump said he doesn’t “think science knows” what’s going on, despite mountains of evidence that science does, in fact, know.

More than 4 million acres of California have been scorched by wildfires this year, which is more than double the state’s previous record for area burned in one season. The season’s not over yet, either. As of Friday morning, the Creek Fire is still burning and is just 58% contained. Twenty other fires are still roaring across California, and forecasts call for elevated fire risk through December for parts of the state, including heavily populated areas in Southern California and the Bay Area. That raises the potential for more damage, which will cost money to repair. Even for the Trump administration, denying aid seems cruel.

Advertisement

Update 10/16/2020, 3:25 p.m. ET: LOL I guess not...In a tweet on Friday afternoon, Rep. Tom McClintock said that President Trump is going to reverse the decision to deny California’s request for aid. “The Presidential Disaster Declaration is imminent and help is on the way,” he said. Good! But what a world.

Advertisement

Update 10/19/2020, 1:55 p.m. ET: A previous version of this story mistakenly said that McClintock tweeted about the President’s reversal on Thursday afternoon, instead of Friday afternoon. We regret the error. We find the world difficult to keep up with!

Staff writer, Earther

Share This Story

Get our newsletter

DISCUSSION

cmallen
C.M. Allen

The Feds keep forgetting that nowhere in the 16th amendment ratifying the collection of federal income taxes does it say HOW those taxes are collected or how they get redistributed. It only gives congress the authority to do so. California can simply and preemptively take the money it requires right off the top. The 16th does not require a state ask permission to assume the funds it needs. The only reason this hasn’t happened before is because none of the states have felt the NEED to buck the unwritten norms of how its been handled in the past. But those norms are not law, and Trump has spent his entire presidential term violating them. So, fight fire with fire. If Trump doesn’t respect the norms, return the favor. Let’s see how far the federal governments budget goes when one its largest taxation sources is using its taxation funds completely for its own needs. Let’s see how many socialism-supported “Red” states are still able to operate without those tax dollars.